Application for Judicial Review (Form 67A)
Form 67A is the application for judicial review in the Supreme Court of Western Australia. It challenges a public decision-maker's decision or conduct, seeking certiorari, mandamus, prohibition or an injunction.
Word document from Supreme Court of Western Australia's website.
DraftOur fillable copy of this form has not been through editorial review yet. Check it against Supreme Court of Western Australia's current form before you rely on it.
- Format
- Word (DOCX)
- Category
- Court form
- Form number
- Form 67A
- Version
- va3abed2e
- Last updated
- 14 October 2026
Supreme Court of Western Australia · Rules of the Supreme Court 1971

For law practices: this form maps to the published matter-field vocabulary, so your practice management system fills it from your matter data - on your own machine. Practice management systems can fetch and assemble it through the document assembly API.
What Form 67A is for
Order 56 of the Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA) governs judicial review. To make an application a person must file Form 67A (O 56 r 2(1)). One application may seek one or more writs (certiorari, mandamus, prohibition, procedendo or quo warranto), a declaration or injunction, or an order having the same effect as a writ (r 2(2)). The application must state its grounds and the applicant's geographical address and service details (r 2(3) and (3A)). The limitation period is generally 6 months after the decision was made or the conduct occurred, or after the applicant became aware of it if later, unless a written law sets a different period (r 1).
When you need it
- You want the Supreme Court to review a decision or conduct that it can review under the common law or in equity by way of a writ, declaration or injunction (the definitions of reviewable decision and reviewable conduct in O 56 r 1).
- You are seeking to quash a decision (certiorari), compel a decision-maker to act (mandamus) or stop a tribunal acting beyond power (prohibition).
- You are outside the 6-month limitation period and need to apply for leave to proceed (r 2(4)).
- You only want an information of quo warranto without judicial review. That is made ex parte by originating motion instead (r 34A).
How to fill it in
- 1
Name the parties
Enter the applicant. The respondent is the person whose decision or conduct is to be reviewed (note 1): give their name and office. List any other parties, such as the other parties to the proceedings in which the decision was made.
- 2
Describe the decision or conduct
Give the date, where it was made or occurred, the written law governing it, and a description of the decision or conduct.
- 3
Tick the remedies
Tick one or more of the writs, a declaration, an injunction, or an order with the same effect as a writ, and set out that order if you tick the last box (note 2).
- 4
Set out the grounds
List the grounds in numbered paragraphs. The application must state the grounds on which it is made (r 2(3)).
- 5
Late application box
Tick it only if the application is outside the limitation period. You must also file an affidavit explaining why the application was not made in time (r 2(4)).
- 6
Give contact and service details
Provide the applicant's geographical address unless the Court orders otherwise, the lawyer's name and business address if represented, or tick "intention to act in person". A postal address for service and telephone number must be given (the lawyer's if represented); email and fax are optional (notes 4 to 8).
- 7
Sign and date
The applicant or the applicant's lawyer signs and dates the form.
Filing, lodging and service
- File the application electronically through the ECMS on the eCourts Portal, unless an exemption applies or the Principal Registrar permits another method (O 67A r 3).
- A filing fee applies - check the current General Division fee schedule.
- After filing, serve the application personally on the person who made the decision or engaged in the conduct, and on anyone who was a party to the proceedings in which it happened (O 56 r 3).
- A person served may enter an appearance under Order 12, or file and serve a notice that they will not take part and will accept any order other than as to costs (O 56 r 4).
- For mandamus, the applicant must state by affidavit that the application is made at their instance; for a corporation, an officer or agent states that (O 56 r 15).
Common mistakes
- Diarise the 6-month limit from the decision date, or from when you became aware of it if later. Check whether the statute under which the decision was made sets a different period (O 56 r 1).
- Discovery and interrogatories are not available unless the Court gives leave (O 56 r 6).
- The Court can refuse all or part of an application that has no reasonable prospect of succeeding (O 56 r 5(2)(j)), so state the grounds precisely.
- The Court's forms page lists this form as "Form 67 - Application for Judicial Review", but in the rules Form 67 is the writ of certiorari. The application is Form 67A.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the time limit for judicial review in the WA Supreme Court?
Generally 6 months after the decision was made or the conduct occurred, or after you became aware of it if later, unless another written law sets a different period (O 56 r 1). A late application must ask for leave and be supported by an affidavit explaining the delay (O 56 r 2(4)).
Who do I serve with a Form 67A?
The decision-maker (or person who engaged in the conduct) and every person who was a party to the proceedings in which the decision was made, by personal service (O 56 r 3). The Court can order service on others with an interest (r 5(2)(b)).
Can I ask for a declaration or injunction in the same application?
Yes. One application may seek any combination of writs, a declaration or injunction, or an order with the same effect as a writ (O 56 r 2(2)).
Checked against the official sources on 26 October 2026
- Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA) O 56, O 67A r 3 and Schedule 2 Form 67A
- Supreme Court of WA - Form 67A Application for Judicial Review (Word)
- Supreme Court of WA - General Division Civil Forms
- Supreme Court of WA - Electronic Documents System
- Supreme Court of WA - General Division fees
General information about the form, not legal advice about your matter. Rules and forms change: if anything here differs from the court or agency's current instructions, theirs apply.
Field map
2 boxes on the Application for Judicial Review (Form 67A) fill from your matter. 2 are for you to complete: ticks, signatures and anything that needs judgement.
- Client
- Client full name(s)
- Key Dates
- Current date
More from Supreme Court of Western Australia
Affidavit
Affidavit template of the Supreme Court of Western Australia, used to give written evidence on oath or affirmation in civil proceedings. It follows Order 37 of the Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA).
View formAffidavit Verifying List of Documents (Form 18)
Form 18 is the affidavit that verifies a party's list of documents (Form 17) when giving discovery in the Supreme Court of Western Australia. It is sworn by the party or by an officer of a company or the State.
Default Judgment in Action for Liquidated Demand (Form 32)
Form 32 is the Supreme Court of Western Australia default judgment for a debt or other liquidated demand where the defendant has not appeared. It includes a notice telling the defendant how to challenge it.
Discontinuance Notice (Form 89)
Form 89 is the notice an appellant files to discontinue an appeal to the General Division of the Supreme Court of Western Australia. It is not used to discontinue an ordinary action.
Memorandum of Appearance (Form 6)
Form 6 is the memorandum of appearance a defendant files in the Supreme Court of Western Australia to answer a writ and defend the action. It gives the defendant's address and service details.
Notice of Change of Representation, Service Details or Address (Form 5AA)
Form 5AA is the Supreme Court of Western Australia notice for changing lawyers, acting in person or updating a party's address or service details. It is filed and served.