Court · Federal Court of Australia · Federal (Commonwealth)

Notice of intention to adduce coincidence evidence (Form 65)

Form 65 is the Federal Court of Australia coincidence notice under section 98(1) of the Evidence Act 1995. Give it before relying on the improbability of similar events occurring by chance.

Get the official form

Word document from Federal Court of Australia's website.

DraftOur fillable copy of this form has not been through editorial review yet. Check it against Federal Court of Australia's current form before you rely on it.

Format
Word (DOCX)
Category
Court form
Form number
Form 65
Version
vc5c3acd7
Last updated
14 October 2026

Federal Court of Australia · Federal Court Rules 2011

Preview of the first page of Notice of intention to adduce coincidence evidence (Form 65)
Preview - first page of the form

For law practices: this form maps to the published matter-field vocabulary, so your practice management system fills it from your matter data - on your own machine. Practice management systems can fetch and assemble it through the document assembly API.

What Form 65 is for

Section 98 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), the coincidence rule, says evidence that 2 or more events occurred is not admissible to prove that a person did a particular act or had a particular state of mind, on the basis that similarities make it improbable the events happened coincidentally, unless the party gave reasonable written notice to each other party and the Court thinks the evidence will have significant probative value. Notices must be given in accordance with the regulations or rules of court (s 99). Rule 30.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 requires the notice to be in accordance with Form 65. The Court can dispense with the notice requirement on application (s 100(2)).

When you need it

  • You want to argue that, because of similarities between 2 or more events or their circumstances, it is improbable they happened by coincidence, and so a person did a particular act or had a particular state of mind.
  • Your case relies on a pattern of similar incidents, transactions or communications.
  • Not needed where you are only explaining or contradicting another party's coincidence evidence (s 98(2)(b)).

How to fill it in

  1. 1

    Copy the heading of the proceeding

    Use the file number, District Registry, Division and party names exactly as they appear on the originating application or notice of appeal (rr 2.13, 2.14). If there are two or more applicants or respondents, add "and another" or "and others" after the first name, as the form prompts.

  2. 2

    Parties and the person concerned

    Address it to each other party, insert your name and the full name of the person alleged to have done the act or had the state of mind.

  3. 3

    Evidence required

    State the substance of the evidence of the 2 or more events and, so far as known, the date, time, place and circumstances of each event, the names of people who saw, heard or otherwise perceived each one and, in a civil case, their addresses (Evidence Regulations 2018 s 7(3)).

  4. 4

    Evidence to establish improbability

    Specify the substance of any further evidence you will rely on to show it is improbable the events occurred coincidentally.

  5. 5

    Act or state of mind

    Specify the particular act or state of mind you seek to prove, then date and sign as the party or the party's lawyer.

Filing, lodging and service

  • Give the notice to each other party in writing. Rules 30.29 to 30.32 prescribe the form of these notices rather than requiring them to be filed, so follow any directions the Court has made about exchanging or filing evidence notices.
  • Give it early enough to be reasonable notice under section 98(1)(a).
  • If notice was not given, you can apply for a direction under section 100(2) that the coincidence rule does not apply to particular evidence.

Common mistakes

  • The form's prompts refer to the old Evidence Regulations. The content requirements are now in the Evidence Regulations 2018 (Cth) s 7(3), which contains the same requirements.
  • Explain the similarities you rely on. The probative value of coincidence evidence turns on them.
  • If you are also relying on the same events as tendency evidence, give a Form 64 notice as well.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between tendency and coincidence evidence?

Tendency evidence (s 97) uses a person's character or conduct to show they tend to act a certain way. Coincidence evidence (s 98) uses the improbability of similar events happening by chance to show a person did an act or had a state of mind.

What happens if I do not give a coincidence notice?

The evidence is not admissible for coincidence reasoning unless the Court gives a direction under section 100 or an exception in section 98(2) applies.

Checked against the official sources on 26 October 2026

General information about the form, not legal advice about your matter. Rules and forms change: if anything here differs from the court or agency's current instructions, theirs apply.

Field map

6 boxes on the Notice of intention to adduce coincidence evidence (Form 65) fill from your matter. 1 is for you to complete: ticks, signatures and anything that needs judgement.

Our Firm
Firm name
Client
Client full name(s), Client state
Operator
User First Name

Matter plans that use this form

More from Federal Court of Australia