Legal Project Management Plan & Checklist
Purpose of this Guide: Use this plan when the client has purchased defective goods that have a failure of a substantial character and wishes to reject the goods to obtain a full refund or replacement. This plan guides the practitioner through assessing durability, serving the statutory notice of rejection, and returning the goods.
Jurisdiction: New Zealand Disputes Tribunal (national jurisdiction). This fork branches from the parent CGA plan to detail the specific steps required for the rejection of goods.
Determine if goods defect is of a substantial character.
The Process at a Glance: The practitioner first evaluates whether the defect is minor or substantial and determines if the goods have been rejected within a reasonable time. The practitioner drafts and serves a formal notice of rejection detailing the specific grounds for rejection. The client must return the goods to the supplier, or request collection if returning them is too costly or difficult. If the supplier disputes the rejection or refuses to pay, the claim is filed in the Disputes Tribunal.
Key Legislation and Case Law: Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 - s 18(3) (right to reject); s 20 (loss of right to reject); s 21 (definition of failure of a substantial character); s 22 (manner of rejecting goods); s 23 (consumer's options on rejection. Key cases: [Cooper v Ashley [2018] NZDT 123](https://www.disputestribunal.govt.nz/).
* Disclaimer: We're nobody's lawyer, because we aren't lawyers. You are, so you know better than to take legal advice from an app. We also aren't accountants or dog trainers - just digital spirit guides taking zero liability for any of this. This site exists to gather the collective knowledge of practitioners like you. Verify everything and submit your feedback on the New Zealand Consumer Guarantees Act Claim (Applicant) - Rejection and Refund of Goods (Section 22) matter plan to improve the playbook. THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, it's a request for input.
This legal matter plan provides a structured workflow for CIVIL_LAW cases, outlining the standard DISPUTE_LITIGATION process. Utilize these tracking templates to manage your legal cases efficiently.
Verify all prerequisite documentation has been obtained, cross-reference against the statutory requirements for this matter type, and confirm compliance with practice direction protocols.
Statutory rule: Section 20 bars rejection if a 'reasonable time' has passed. Reasonable time depends on the nature and use of the goods and expected durability.
Legally execute Section 22 notice of rejection.
Prepare the relevant forms and supporting materials required under the applicable legislation, ensuring all mandatory fields are completed and all attachments are properly certified.
Draft and dispatch formal correspondence addressing the procedural requirements at this stage, including any required notices, requests for information, or proposals for resolution.
Coordinate the collection and review of all financial documentation required for disclosure, including statements, valuations, and supporting schedules as mandated by the rules.
Formulate Disputes Tribunal goods remedy claim.
Conduct a thorough review of all filed materials to ensure compliance with court requirements, verify service obligations have been met, and prepare for the next procedural milestone.
Assess the strategic considerations for interim applications, prepare supporting evidence, and draft the necessary documentation for urgent or time-sensitive relief sought.
Verify all prerequisite documentation has been obtained, cross-reference against the statutory requirements for this matter type, and confirm compliance with practice direction protocols.
Got a question about this plan?
Ask in the practitioner Discord - edge cases, rule changes, and jurisdiction-specific nuances, all in one place.