Legal Project Management Plan & Checklist
Purpose of this Guide: Use this plan when representing an accused person where the police have discovered physical evidence (such as weapons, drugs, or cash) as a direct consequence of a Charter-breaching statement. This fork assists counsel in navigating the complex intersection of self-incrimination and physical discovery.
Jurisdiction: This plan operates under Canadian federal criminal law and is applicable across all provincial and superior criminal courts. It addresses derivative evidence issues under Section 24(2) where the initial violation occurred during interrogation and led to physical items.
Verify all prerequisite documentation has been obtained, cross-reference against the statutory requirements for this matter type, and confirm compliance with practice direction protocols.
The Process at a Glance: The process focuses on establishing the temporal and causal link between the initial Charter breach (e.g., a forced confession) and the physical evidence eventually obtained. The lawyer performs a detailed discoverability audit, assessing whether the Crown can prove that the physical evidence would have been inevitably discovered through lawful, independent means. Counsel drafts specific submissions under the Grant framework, challenges Crown assertions of independent source, and cross-examines investigators during the voir dire.
Key Legislation and Case Law: Governed by Section 7, Section 8, Section 10(b), and Section 24(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Justice Laws). Under the modern framework established in R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, discoverability is no longer a strict threshold bar but is integrated into the Branch 2 and Branch 3 qualitative analysis. The historical foundation is R. v. Stillman, 1997 CanLII 384. Case law verification uses CanLII (Canadian Legal Information Institute).
* Disclaimer: We're nobody's lawyer, because we aren't lawyers. You are, so you know better than to take legal advice from an app. We also aren't accountants or dog trainers - just digital spirit guides taking zero liability for any of this. This site exists to gather the collective knowledge of practitioners like you. Verify everything and submit your feedback on the Charter Evidence Exclusion Application (Accused) - Derivative Physical Evidence Pathway matter plan to improve the playbook. THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, it's a request for input.
This legal matter plan provides a structured workflow for Criminal Law cases, outlining the standard Litigation process. Utilize these tracking templates to manage your legal cases efficiently.
Under R. v. Mack [1988] 2 SCR 903, a causal relationship is not strictly required. The threshold is met if the breach and the discovery of the evidence are part of the same transaction.
Prepare the relevant forms and supporting materials required under the applicable legislation, ensuring all mandatory fields are completed and all attachments are properly certified.
Draft and dispatch formal correspondence addressing the procedural requirements at this stage, including any required notices, requests for information, or proposals for resolution.
Coordinate the collection and review of all financial documentation required for disclosure, including statements, valuations, and supporting schedules as mandated by the rules.
Got a question about this plan?
Ask in the practitioner Discord - edge cases, rule changes, and jurisdiction-specific nuances, all in one place.