Legal Project Management Plan & Checklist
Purpose of this Guide: Use this plan when representing a client in Canadian criminal proceedings where fitness to stand trial or criminal responsibility (NCR) under section sixteen of the Criminal Code is in issue. It guides defence counsel through client intake, forensic assessment orders, fitness hearings, substantive NCR trials, and Review Board referrals.
Jurisdiction: This plan operates under Canadian federal criminal law and applies in courts across all provinces and territories. The forks address: (1) fitness restoration and treatment orders under section six hundred and seventy-two point five eight, (2) opposing Crown applications for High-Risk Accused designations under section six hundred and seventy-two point six four, and (3) provincial Review Board notice and electronic filing workflows.
The Process at a Glance: The process starts with identifying whether the client understands court proceedings and can instruct counsel. If fitness is doubted, counsel applies for a court-ordered fitness assessment. A forensic hospital evaluates the client. If unfit, the client enters the restoration pathway. If fit but suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the offence, counsel prepares the substantive Not Criminally Responsible defence. The trial determines guilt, and the NCR issue is litigated post-verdict. If NCR is found, the court refers the matter to the provincial Review Board for disposition.
Use this plan when a client has been found unfit to stand trial and is subject to a Crown application for an involuntary treatment order to restore fitness, or requires a stay of proceedings due to permanent unfitness. It guides counsel through opposing treatment applications, challenging admission delays, and securing stays of proceedings.
Use this plan to manage ongoing Review Board hearings, file notices, and comply with provincial electronic filing and naming standards. It guides counsel through motions under Rule 8, filing constitutional notices, and representing clients at annual review hearings.
Use this plan when the Crown applies to designate a client as a High-Risk Accused under section six hundred and seventy-two point six four of the Criminal Code. It guides counsel through opposing HRA applications, contesting risk assessments, and navigating the secure detention regime.
Key Legislation and Case Law: The proceeding is governed by the Criminal Code (Justice Laws Portal), specifically section sixteen for the Not Criminally Responsible defence, section two for definitions of fitness and disease of the mind, and Part twenty point one for assessment orders and dispositions. Key constitutional rights are protected under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Justice Laws Portal). Key authorities include R. v. Swain, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 933, R. v. Taylor (1992), 77 C.C.C. (3d) 551, R. v. Conception, 2014 SCC 60, Cooper v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 1149, R. v. Bouchard-Lebrun, 2011 SCC 58, and Winko v. British Columbia, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 625. Case details are accessible on CanLII (Canadian Legal Information Institute).
* Disclaimer: We're nobody's lawyer, because we aren't lawyers. You are, so you know better than to take legal advice from an app. We also aren't accountants or dog trainers - just digital spirit guides taking zero liability for any of this. This site exists to gather the collective knowledge of practitioners like you. Verify everything and submit your feedback on the Not Criminally Responsible (NCR) Defence and Fitness (Accused) matter plan to improve the playbook. THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, it's a request for input.
This legal matter plan provides a structured workflow for Criminal Law cases, outlining the standard Litigation process. Utilize these tracking templates to manage your legal cases efficiently.
Establish the file, complete conflict checks, and gather initial psychiatric history.
Verify all prerequisite documentation has been obtained, cross-reference against the statutory requirements for this matter type, and confirm compliance with practice direction protocols.
Got a question about this plan?
Ask in the practitioner Discord - edge cases, rule changes, and jurisdiction-specific nuances, all in one place.
Prepare the relevant forms and supporting materials required under the applicable legislation, ensuring all mandatory fields are completed and all attachments are properly certified.
Draft and dispatch formal correspondence addressing the procedural requirements at this stage, including any required notices, requests for information, or proposals for resolution.
Secure the court order directing a designated forensic psychiatrist to evaluate the client.
Coordinate the collection and review of all financial documentation required for disclosure, including statements, valuations, and supporting schedules as mandated by the rules.
Section 672.15 of the Criminal Code (Canada) enforces strict caps on assessment durations to protect the liberty of the accused. Section 672.17 suspends Part XVI bail/detention orders during the duration of the assessment order.
Conduct a thorough review of all filed materials to ensure compliance with court requirements, verify service obligations have been met, and prepare for the next procedural milestone.
Assess the strategic considerations for interim applications, prepare supporting evidence, and draft the necessary documentation for urgent or time-sensitive relief sought.
Argue the client's fitness status and receive the court's judicial determination.
Verify all prerequisite documentation has been obtained, cross-reference against the statutory requirements for this matter type, and confirm compliance with practice direction protocols.
Prepare the relevant forms and supporting materials required under the applicable legislation, ensuring all mandatory fields are completed and all attachments are properly certified.
The threshold for fitness is established in R. v. Taylor (1992), 77 C.C.C. (3d) 551 (Ont. C.A.) as 'limited cognitive capacity'. However, under R. v. Bharwani (2001), 156 C.C.C. (3d) 1 (Ont. C.A.), the presence of delusions will render an accused unfit if those delusions actively distort their basic understanding of the judicial process or capacity to instruct counsel.
Draft and dispatch formal correspondence addressing the procedural requirements at this stage, including any required notices, requests for information, or proposals for resolution.