Legal Project Management Plan & Checklist
Litigate a Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD) defence to a murder charge in Canada.
What does NCRMD mean in Canadian law?: Under section 16 of the Criminal Code, an accused is not criminally responsible if they suffered from a "disease of the mind" that rendered them incapable of appreciating the nature and quality of the act or knowing that it was morally wrong.
What happens after an NCRMD verdict?: An NCRMD verdict is not an acquittal. The accused is referred to the provincial Review Board for a disposition hearing under s. 672.54, which may result in a hospital detention order, conditional discharge, or absolute discharge.
Jurisdiction: Superior Court of Justice and Provincial Review Board.
The Process at a Glance: The defence retains forensic psychiatrists to evaluate the accused, raises the s. 16 defence at trial, rebuts the presumption of sanity on a balance of probabilities, and manages the subsequent Review Board transition.
Key Legislation and Case Law: Criminal Code (s. 16, s. 672.54). R. v. Cooper (appreciating nature of the act) and R. v. Oommen (knowing the act was wrong).
* Disclaimer: We're nobody's lawyer, because we aren't lawyers. You are, so you know better than to take legal advice from an app. We also aren't accountants or dog trainers - just digital spirit guides taking zero liability for any of this. This site exists to gather the collective knowledge of practitioners like you. Verify everything and submit your feedback on the Criminal Defence: First Degree Murder (Accused) - NCRMD (s. 16) matter plan to improve the playbook. THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, it's a request for input.
This legal matter plan provides a structured workflow for Criminal Law cases, outlining the standard Litigation process. Utilize these tracking templates to manage your legal cases efficiently.
Verify all prerequisite documentation has been obtained, cross-reference against the statutory requirements for this matter type, and confirm compliance with practice direction protocols.
Prepare the relevant forms and supporting materials required under the applicable legislation, ensuring all mandatory fields are completed and all attachments are properly certified.
Draft and dispatch formal correspondence addressing the procedural requirements at this stage, including any required notices, requests for information, or proposals for resolution.
The burden of proof rests on the party raising the s. 16 defence, on a balance of probabilities.
Coordinate the collection and review of all financial documentation required for disclosure, including statements, valuations, and supporting schedules as mandated by the rules.
R. v. Cooper [1980] 1 SCR 1149: 'Appreciating' refers to an inability to understand the physical consequences of the act. It does not require appropriate emotional reactions like guilt.
R. v. Oommen [1994] 2 SCR 507: The 'knowing it was wrong' requirement is met if the disorder deprives the accused of the capacity for rational perception, preventing a rational choice regarding right and wrong.
Conduct a thorough review of all filed materials to ensure compliance with court requirements, verify service obligations have been met, and prepare for the next procedural milestone.
R. v. Swain established that the Crown can only raise NCRMD independently after a finding of guilt on the actus reus, to prevent compromising the defence.
Assess the strategic considerations for interim applications, prepare supporting evidence, and draft the necessary documentation for urgent or time-sensitive relief sought.
Got a question about this plan?
Ask in the practitioner Discord - edge cases, rule changes, and jurisdiction-specific nuances, all in one place.