Legal Project Management Plan & Checklist
Purpose of this Guide: Use this plan when your client believes they have suffered injury, loss, or damage as a result of substandard medical treatment by a doctor, hospital, nurse, dentist, or other health professional in New South Wales. Medical negligence matters require expert evidence to establish both breach of duty and causation - open this plan as soon as you receive initial instructions so that limitation period management and records requests can begin immediately.
Jurisdiction: New South Wales. Medical negligence claims are filed in the District Court of NSW (for claims within its jurisdiction, broadly up to $750,000) or the Supreme Court of NSW - Professional Negligence List (managed under Practice Note SC CL 07) for larger claims. The governing legislation is the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) together with the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).
The Process at a Glance: A medical negligence claim begins with a careful analysis of the limitation period - under the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) s14, the claim must be commenced within 3 years of the date of discoverability (when the claimant knew or ought to have known of the injury, its cause, and the potential link to negligence). All relevant medical records are requested from treating providers under the Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 (NSW). An independent medico-legal expert in the same specialty is briefed to provide an opinion on breach of the standard of care (overcoming the s5O peer professional opinion defence) and causation. If the expert opinion supports the claim, a formal notice of claim is served on the defendant and their medical indemnity insurer. Pre-litigation settlement or mediation is attempted. If proceedings are required, a Statement of Claim is filed and the matter is managed under the Professional Negligence List practice note, including expert conclave orders. All heads of damage are quantified including past and future economic loss, future care, and non-economic loss subject to the 15% threshold and capped at $804,000 (1 October 2025). Medicare benefits paid are repaid to the Commonwealth under the HOSC Act on settlement.
Key Legislation and Case Law: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) - s5O (peer professional opinion defence: not liable if acted in a manner widely accepted by peer professional opinion as competent practice); s5D (causation: factual causation and scope of liability); ss16-17 (non-economic loss: 15% threshold, cap $804,000 from 1 October 2025). Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) - s14 (3-year limitation period from discoverability). Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) - r31.24 (expert obligations, conclaves). Health and Other Services (Compensation) Act 1995 (Cth) (Medicare refund obligations on settlement). Case law: Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 (duty to warn of material risks - failure to warn is NOT covered by s5O); Wallace v Kam [2013] HCA 19 (causation in failure to warn cases).
* Disclaimer: We're nobody's lawyer, because we aren't lawyers. You are, so you know better than to take legal advice from an app. We also aren't accountants or dog trainers - just digital spirit guides taking zero liability for any of this. This site exists to gather the collective knowledge of practitioners like you. Verify everything and submit your feedback on the Medical Negligence (Plaintiff) matter plan to improve the playbook. THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, it's a request for input.
This legal matter plan provides a structured workflow for PERSONAL_INJURY cases, outlining the standard DISPUTE_LITIGATION process. Utilize these tracking templates to manage your legal cases efficiently.
Protect the limitation period and obtain the evidentiary foundation for the claim.
Establish a credible claim that overcomes the s5O peer professional opinion defence.
Quantify the claim so that settlement negotiations can begin on an informed basis.
Initiate formal negotiations and comply with pre-litigation obligations.
Protect the limitation period if negotiations fail and advance to trial preparation.
Narrow the disputed issues to maximise settlement prospects or prepare for trial.
Got a question about this plan?
Ask in the practitioner Discord - edge cases, rule changes, and jurisdiction-specific nuances, all in one place.