Legal Project Management Plan & Checklist
Purpose of this Guide: Use this plan when representing a respondent defending against a spouse or de facto partner maintenance application. This guide is designed for legal practitioners to assess the applicant's claim of need, evaluate the respondent's financial capacity, and formulate a defence strategy. It helps the practitioner respond to pre-filing notices and draft the necessary responsive pleadings and financial disclosures.
| Field | Token | Type | Required | Defined in |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matter(4) | ||||
| Matter numberⓘ | matter.matterNumber | text | Required | |
Jurisdiction: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA), operating under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) and the FCFCOA (Family Law) Rules 2021. This plan applies to respondents defending claims in the federal registry. It is a fork of the federal spouse and de facto maintenance plan.
The Process at a Glance: The matter begins with receiving the applicant's initiating package, verifying valid service, and checking the limitation dates. The practitioner meets with the client to evaluate the applicant's financial need against the respondent's capacity to pay, including reviewing any statutory pension status. The practitioner drafts a response to the pre-filing Notice of Intention and coordinates counter-offers. If litigation proceeds, the practitioner drafts the Response to Initiating Application, Financial Statement, Questionnaire, and respondent's Affidavit. After execution, the package is filed and served on the applicant within 35 days of service. The practitioner then represents the respondent at directions events and works to resolve the claim.
Key Legislation and Case Law: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) - Section 72 and Section 90SE (right to maintenance), Section 75(2) and Section 90SF(3) (discretionary matters), Section 44 (limitation periods and leave exceptions), and Section 77A and Section 90SH (lump-sum specifications). Key case law includes In the Marriage of Eliades (1981) 6 Fam LR 516 (need and capacity), In the Marriage of Bevan (1993) 17 Fam LR 474 (capacity to pay), [Seden v Kehoe [2002] FMCAfam 324](https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FMCAfam/2002/324.html) (need vs capacity), Whitford and Whitford (1979) 4 Fam LR 754 (hardship standards), [V and S [2006] FLC 93-274](https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FamCA/2006/158.html) (probability of success), and Jameson Law (2018) (consequences of non-disclosure and costs). FCFCOA (Family Law) Rules 2021 - Rule 6.06 (mandatory response filings), Rule 6.02 (disclosure undertaking), and Rule 6.05 (document exchange timelines).
* Disclaimer: We're nobody's lawyer, because we aren't lawyers. You are, so you know better than to take legal advice from an app. We also aren't accountants or dog trainers - just digital spirit guides taking zero liability for any of this. This site exists to gather the collective knowledge of practitioners like you. Verify everything and submit your feedback on the Spouse and De Facto Maintenance Application (Respondent) - Respondent Client (Respondent Defence Pathway) matter plan to improve the playbook. THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, it's a request for input.
This legal matter plan provides a structured workflow for Family Law cases, outlining the standard DISPUTE_LITIGATION process. Utilize these tracking templates to manage your legal cases efficiently.
inheritedmatter-core |
| Matter title | matter.title | text | - | inheritedmatter-core |
| Matter typeⓘ | matter.matterType | text | - | inheritedmatter-core |
| Matter status | matter.status | text | - | inheritedmatter-core |
| Client(1) | ||||
| Client name | matter.clientName | text | Required | inheritedmatter-core |
Verify service date and timing.
Draft Response, Financial Statement, Questionnaire, and Affidavit.
Lodge package in Commonwealth Courts Portal within 35 days.
Got a question about this plan?
Ask in the practitioner Discord - edge cases, rule changes, and jurisdiction-specific nuances, all in one place.